长白山退化泥炭沼泽恢复过程中土壤活性有机碳组分和酶活性变化

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202508.015

应用生态学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8): 2361-2369.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202508.015

长白山退化泥炭沼泽恢复过程中土壤活性有机碳组分和酶活性变化

李玲慧¹, 刘怡君¹, 王怡萌¹, 王铭^1,2,3*

¹东北师范大学地理科学学院泥炭沼泽研究所, 长春 130024;
²长白山地理过程与生态安全教育部重点实验室, 长春 130024;
³东北师范大学国家环境保护湿地生态与植被恢复重点实验室, 长春 130024

收稿日期:2024-12-31 接受日期:2025-06-09 出版日期:2025-08-18 发布日期:2026-02-18
通讯作者: *E-mail: wangm100@nenu.edu.cn
作者简介:李玲慧, 女, 2002年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事湿地恢复研究。E-mail: lilinghui278@nenu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFF1305800)和国家自然科学基金项目(42330509)

Change of soil labile organic carbon fractions and enzyme activities during peatland restoration in Changbai Mountains, Northeast China

LI Linghui¹, LIU Yijun¹, WANG Yimeng¹, WANG Ming^1,2,3*

¹Institute for Peat and Mire Research, School of Geographical Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China;
²Key Laboratory of Geographical Processes and Ecological Security of Changbai Mountains, Ministry of Education, Changchun 130024, China;
³State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China

Received:2024-12-31 Accepted:2025-06-09 Online:2025-08-18 Published:2026-02-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 泥炭沼泽是陆地最重要的碳储存库之一,其土壤活性有机碳组分对环境条件变化的响应是反映泥炭沼泽土壤碳库稳定状况的重要指标。土壤酶是泥炭沼泽生物化学过程的主要参与者,影响泥炭沼泽物质循环和能量流动过程。本研究以长白山区退化、恢复3、5、8年和天然泥炭沼泽为对象,测定土壤活性有机碳组分和酶活性及土壤理化性质和地上生物量,探究退化泥炭沼泽在近自然恢复过程中土壤活性有机碳组分和酶活性的变化特征及其驱动因素。结果表明: 泥炭沼泽近自然恢复后,易氧化有机碳(EOC)、微生物生物量碳(MBC)和可溶性有机碳(DOC)含量均呈显著增加趋势。其中,MBC和DOC含量随着恢复年限的增加逐渐升高,与退化泥炭沼泽相比,恢复8年泥炭沼泽的MBC和DOC分别提高139.7%和160.2%;而EOC含量在恢复3年后即已达到天然泥炭沼泽水平,表现出更快速的恢复响应特征。近自然恢复后,泥炭沼泽0~10 cm土壤的β-1,4-N-乙酰葡糖氨糖苷酶(NAG)和酸性磷酸酶(ACP)活性显著增加。恢复8年后,两种酶活性较退化状态分别提高30.1%和84.1%;而β-1,4-葡萄糖苷酶(βG)活性在泥炭沼泽恢复3年后提高60.8%,但在恢复5年后略有下降,恢复8年后与退化泥炭沼泽的酶活性无显著差异。相关分析和结构方程模型结果显示,泥炭沼泽恢复过程中土壤有机碳(SOC)含量直接影响其活性碳组分,而活性碳组分和地上生物量共同影响土壤酶活性。综上,近自然恢复措施能有效提高退化泥炭沼泽土壤活性有机碳组分和酶活性,促进生态系统功能的恢复。本研究结果可为退化泥炭沼泽的生态恢复与管理提供重要的基础数据和参考依据。

关键词: 泥炭沼泽, 土壤活性有机碳, 酶活性, 长白山区, 近自然恢复

Abstract: Peatlands are one of the most important terrestrial carbon storage reservoirs. The response of soil labile organic carbon fractions to environmental changes is a pivotal indicator for assessing the stability of soil organic carbon pools. Soil enzymes act as primary participants in the biogeochemical processes of peatlands, significantly influence the material cycling and energy flow. Taking natural peatlands, degraded peatlands, and peatlands restored for 3, 5, and 8 years in the Changbai Mountains as test objects, we examined the changes of soil labile organic carbon fractions, enzyme activities, soil physicochemical properties, and aboveground biomass during peatland restoration. The results showed that the contents of easily oxidizable organic carbon (EOC), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) increased following peatland restoration. Both MBC and DOC exhi-bited a progressive increase with restoration duration, showing cumulative rises of 139.7% and 160.2%, respec-tively, after 8 years of restoration. In contrast, EOC recovered to the level comparable to natural peatland within just 3 years of restoration, exhibiting a notably rapid recovery. Restoration significantly increase the activities of β-1,4-N-acetylglucosamine glycosidase (NAG) and acid phosphatase (ACP) in the 0-10 cm soil layer. After 8 years of restoration, the activities of NAG and ACP increased by 30.1% and 84.1%, respectively. However, the activity of β-1,4-glucosidase (βG) increased by 60.8% after 3 years of restoration, decreased slightly after 5 years of restoration, and showed no significant difference between the peatland restored for 8 years and the degraded peatlands. Correlation analysis and structural equation modeling showed that soil organic carbon directly influenced soil labile organic carbon fractions, while soil labile organic carbon fractions and aboveground biomass collectively influenced soil enzyme activity. In conclusion, natural-based restoration could effectively increase soil labile organic carbon fractions and soil microbial enzyme activities, thereby promoting peatland recovery. This study would provide basic data and a reference framework for the ecological restoration and management of degraded peatlands.

Key words: peatland, soil labile organic carbon fraction, soil enzyme activity, Changbai Mountain, natural-based restoration

李玲慧, 刘怡君, 王怡萌, 王铭. 长白山退化泥炭沼泽恢复过程中土壤活性有机碳组分和酶活性变化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(8): 2361-2369.

LI Linghui, LIU Yijun, WANG Yimeng, WANG Ming. Change of soil labile organic carbon fractions and enzyme activities during peatland restoration in Changbai Mountains, Northeast China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(8): 2361-2369.

参考文献

[1] Charman D. Peatlands and Environmental Change. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2002, 19: 505-507
[2] Yu ZC, Loisel J, Brosseau DP, et al. Global peatland dynamics since the Last Glacial Maximum. Geophysical Research Letters, 2010, 37: L13402
[3] Wang SR, Zhuang QL, Lahteenoja O, et al. Potential shift from a carbon sink to a source in Amazonian peatlands under a changing climate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018, 115: 12407-12412
[4] Wang HY, Wu JQ, Li G, et al. Changes in soil carbon fractions and enzyme activities under different vegetation types of the northern Loess Plateau. Ecology and Evolution, 2020, 10: 12211-12223
[5] Chen L, Zhou SL, Zhang Q, et al. Effect of organic material addition on active soil organic carbon and microbial diversity: A meta-analysis. Soil and Tillage Research, 2024, 241: 106128
[6] He LY, Lu SX, Wang CG, et al. Changes in soil orga-nic carbon fractions and enzyme activities in response to tillage practices in the Loess Plateau of China. Soil and Tillage Research, 2021, 209: 104940
[7] Zhou B, Zhao LX, Wang YB, et al. Spatial distribution of phthalate esters and the associated response of enzyme activities and microbial community composition in typical plastic-shed vegetable soils in China. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2020, 195: 110495
[8] Monytes G, Solano-Campos F, Vega-Baudrit JR, et al. Environmentally relevant concentrations of silver nano-particles diminish soil microbial biomass but do not alter enzyme activities or microbial diversity. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 391: 122224
[9] Zhao ZH, Zhang CZ, Li F, et al. Effect of compost and inorganic fertilizer on organic carbon and activities of carbon cycle enzymes in aggregates of an intensively cultivated Vertisol. PLoS One, 2020, 15(3): e0229644
[10] Deng SR, Li JY, Du ZZ, et al. Rice ACID PHOSPHATASE 1 regulates Pi stress adaptation by maintaining intracellular Pi homeostasis. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2022, 45: 191-205
[11] Romanowicz KJ, Kane ES, Potvin LR, et al. Understanding drivers of peatland extracellular enzyme activity in the PEATcosm experiment: Mixed evidence for enzymic latch hypothesis. Plant and Soil, 2015, 397: 371-386
[12] Sinsabaugh RL, Hill BH, Follstad Shah JJ. Ecoenzyma-tic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment. Nature, 2009, 462: 795-798
[13] Liu LF, Tian JQ, Wang HJ, et al. Stable oxic-anoxic transitional interface is beneficial to retard soil carbon loss in drained peatland. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2023, 181: 109024
[14] Cui J, Zhu ZK, Xu XL, et al. Carbon and nitrogen recycling from microbial necromass to cope with C:N stoichiometric imbalance by priming. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2020, 142: 107720
[15] Georgiou K, Jackson RB, Vinduková O, et al. Global stocks and capacity of mineral-associated soil organic carbon. Nature Communications, 2022, 13: 3797
[16] Wang M, Talbot J, Moore TR. Drainage and fertilization effects on nutrient availability in an ombrotrophic peatland. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 621: 1255-1263
[17] Bragazza L, Buttler A, Habermacher J, et al. High nitrogen deposition alters the decomposition of bog plant litter and reduces carbon accumulation. Global Change Biology, 2012, 18: 1163-1172
[18] Ma L, Zhu GF, Chen BL, et al. A globally robust relationship between water table decline, subsidence rate, and carbon release from peatlands. Communications Earth and Environment, 2022, 3: 254
[19] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 第3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 42-108
[20] Saiya-Cork KR, Sinsabaugh RL, Zak DR. The effects of long term nitrogen deposition on extracellular enzyme activity in an Acer saccharum forest soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2002, 34: 1309-1315
[21] 吴金水, 林启美, 黄巧云, 等. 土壤微生物生物量测定方法及其应用. 北京: 气象出版社, 2006: 117-141
[22] Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1987, 19: 703-707
[23] Blair G, Lefroy R, Lisle L. Soil carbon fractions based on their degree of oxidation, and the development of a carbon management index for agricultural systems. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1995, 46: 393-406
[24] Bell CW, Fricks BE, Rocca JD, et al. High-throughput fluorometric measurement of potential soil extracellular enzyme activities. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 2013, 15: e50961
[25] 马雪燕, 穆兴民, 王双银, 等. 黄土丘陵区不同植被恢复对土壤入渗影响及适宜模型研究. 水土保持学报, 2023, 37(2): 67-75
[26] Jiang XJ, Liu W, Chen C, et al. Effects of three morphometric features of roots on soil water flow behavior in three sites in China. Geoderma, 2018, 320: 161-171
[27] 邓思宇, 陈袁波, 余珂, 等. 不同类型泥炭沼泽湿地无机离子、溶解有机质的变化特征及生态学意义. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(2): 571-580
[28] 徐飞. 垦殖与恢复对三江平原沼泽湿地土壤微生物群落结构与功能多样性的影响. 博士论文. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2017
[29] 李晨阳, 孔祥强, 董合忠. 植物吸收转运硝态氮及其信号调控研究进展. 核农学报, 2020, 34(5): 982-993
[30] Lin X, Tfaily MM, Steinweg JM, et al. Microbial community stratification linked to utilization of carbohydrates and phosphorus limitation in a boreal peatland at Marcell Experimental Forest, Minnesota, USA. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2014, 80: 3518-3530
[31] Oorschot MV, Gaalen NV, Maltby E, et al. Experimental manipulation of water levels in two French riverine grassland soils. Acta Oecologica, 2000, 21: 49-62
[32] Boye K, Noël V, Tfaily MM, et al. Thermodynamically controlled preservation of organic carbon in floodplains. Nature Geoscience, 2017, 10: 415-419
[33] 黄靖宇, 宋长春, 宋艳宇, 等. 湿地垦殖对土壤微生物量及土壤溶解有机碳、氮的影响. 环境科学, 2008, 29(5): 1380-1387
[34] Wang K, Sheng MY, Wang LJ, et al. Response of soil phytolith-occluded organic carbon accumulation to long-term vegetation restoration in Southwest China karst. Land Degradation and Development, 2022, 33: 3088-3102
[35] Wang J, Zhang A, Zheng YJ, et al. Long-term litter removal rather than litter addition enhances ecosystem carbon sequestration in a temperate steppe. Functional Ecology, 2021, 35: 2799-2807
[36] Cusack DF, Silver WL, Torn MS, et al. Effects of nitrogen additions on above-and belowground carbon dyna-mics in two tropical forests. Biogeochemistry, 2011, 104: 203-225
[37] Loris D, Denis L, Laurent A, et al. Hydro-ecological controls on dissolved carbon dynamics in groundwater and export to streams in a temperate pine forest. Biogeosciences, 2018, 15: 669-691
[38] 全紫曼, 漆燕, 周泽弘, 等. 山黧豆还田与氮肥减施对稻田土壤活性有机碳组分及酶活性的影响. 草业科学, 2024, 41(5): 1057-1067
[39] Bonn A, Allott T, Evans M, eds. Peatland Restoration and Ecosystem Services: Science, Policy and Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2016: 129-150
[40] Zhang YM, Huang XY, Wang RC, et al. The distribution of long-chain n-alkan-2-ones in peat can be used to infer past changes in pH. Chemical Geology, 2020, 544: 119622
[41] Trivedi P, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Trivedi C, et al. Microbial regulation of the soil carbon cycle: Evidence from gene-enzyme relationships. The ISME Journal, 2016, 10: 2593-2604
[42] 刘文兰, 孙学刚, 焦健, 等. 黄河兰州段湿地土壤与甘蒙柽柳叶片碳氮磷生态化学计量特征. 北京林业大学学报, 2023, 45(6): 43-51
[43] 梁超, 朱雪峰. 土壤微生物碳泵储碳机制概论. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2021, 51(5): 680-695
[44] Sinsabaugh RL, Lauber CL, Weintraub MN, et al. Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale. Ecology Letters, 2008, 11: 1252-1264
[45] Campbell TP, Ulrich D, Toyoda JG, et al. Microbial communities influence soil dissolved organic carbon concentration by altering metabolite composition. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2022, 12: 799014
[46] Yan SB, Yin LM, Dijkstra FA, et al. Priming effect on soil carbon decomposition by root exudate surrogates: A meta-analysis. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2023, 178: 108955
[47] 王钰婷, 徐志伟, 孙德敬, 等. 水位恢复对排水泥炭沼泽土壤酶活性的影响. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(10): 1940-1947
[48] 韩子琛, 郭强, 夏允, 等. 亚热带三种林分土壤酶活性和酶化学计量比特征. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(6): 1501-1508

长白山退化泥炭沼泽恢复过程中土壤活性有机碳组分和酶活性变化

Change of soil labile organic carbon fractions and enzyme activities during peatland restoration in Changbai Mountains, Northeast China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	朱雨, 李杰, 刘丽君, 韦柳红, 陈淑婷, 邓璐嫔, 朱同彬, 段敏. 亚热带岩溶区森林不同土壤氮水平下固氮植物对根际土壤磷含量的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(7): 2019-2027.
[2]	徐玲, 薛丹, 孙嘉悦, 邹庆, 黄贝贝, 刘恋, 吴林. 不同营养类型泥炭地土壤酶活性及其化学计量特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(6): 1880-1888.
[3]	谢雨霜, 韩冰鑫, 柳荻, 雷怡婷, 王晓春. 干旱对白桦和水曲柳木质部形成过程和生长的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(5): 1289-1297.
[4]	殷启杰, 姜建武, 殷汉琴, 杨宗坤, 龚冬琴, 李桂芳, 褚先尧, 刘文波, 张敏. 有机物料投入对新垦耕地土壤养分和微生物代谢的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(4): 969-983.
[5]	车佳聪, 杨佳, 吴政鸿, 谷会岩. 林火对小兴安岭阔叶红松林土壤理化性质、酶活性和微生物群落的长期影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(4): 1071-1080.
[6]	毛娇艳, 杨青, 郭琦玲, 孙嘉雯, 施秀珍, 王建青. 亚热带天然林转换为锥栗林后土壤胞外酶活性及其化学计量特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(2): 481-488.
[7]	孙榕, 赵颖志, 陈勇, 郑旭理, 周燕, 邵帅, 梁辰飞, 秦华, 陈俊辉. 典型毛竹入侵阔叶林生境凋落物、土壤碳氮组分及酶活性特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(2): 489-496.
[8]	沈阳, 李晓英, 蔡慧颖, 许涛, 李景涛, 陈魁. 林火干扰后大兴安岭多年冻土区土壤胞外酶活性变化特征及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(2): 497-203.
[9]	张仲富, 王禹童, 艾静, 刀静梅, 李傲梅, 邓军, 吴建明, 赵勇. 钾肥对甘蔗根际微生物多样性和群落构建过程的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(2): 526-536.
[10]	吴佳芯, 李邵宇, 韩国栋. 不同放牧强度下荒漠草原土壤化学计量失衡与微生物碳利用效率的联系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(8): 2108-2118.
[11]	田圣陶, 罗洋, 隋鹏祥, 王浩, 任英, 周思琪, 刘海峰, 郑金玉. 长期耕作对黑土有机碳储量及其组分的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(8): 2167-2175.
[12]	周琦锐, 赵梦停, 杨丽, 栾佳萌, 高源, 黄正来, 马尚宇, 樊永惠, 张文静. 外源6-BA对孕穗期低温胁迫后小麦旗叶生理、产量及品质的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(6): 1573-1582.
[13]	王燚, 李文珊, 展鹏飞, 王行. 若尔盖高原泥炭沼泽土壤微生物空间分布 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(6): 1705-1715.
[14]	张鹏, 田瑞, 胡啸, 赵同亮, 雷俊, 王鹤龄, 吕晓东. 增温和降水变化对陇中黄土高原半干旱麦田土壤有机碳和酶活性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(11): 3031-3042.
[15]	安小兵, 郑粉莉, 王雪松, 杨新月, 梁瑞, 王伦. 冻融作用对东北黑土区坡耕地土壤微生物养分限制的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(10): 2744-2754.