不同水平氮添加下华北盐渍化草地根际土壤阴阳离子特征

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202401.007

应用生态学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 212-218.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202401.007

不同水平氮添加下华北盐渍化草地根际土壤阴阳离子特征

常婕^1,2, 居新^1,2, 伊李凯^1,2, 宁亚楠^1,2, 刁华杰^1,2, 郝杰^1,2, 王常慧^1,2*, 董宽虎^1,2

¹山西农业大学草业学院/草地生态保护与乡土草种质创新山西省重点实验室, 山西晋中 030801;
²山西右玉黄土高原草地生态系统国家定位观测研究站, 山西朔州 037200

收稿日期:2023-08-21 接受日期:2023-11-25 出版日期:2024-01-18 发布日期:2024-03-21
通讯作者: * E-mail: wangch@ibcas.ac.cn
作者简介:常婕, 女, 1999年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事草地生态学研究。E-mail: changjie81629@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金区域创新联合基金项目 (U22A20576)、国家重点研发计划项目子课题 (2022YFF1302801)、山西省重点实验室项目(202104010910017)和山西农业大学高层次引进人才专项 (2021XG008)

Characteristics of anion and cation in rhizosphere soil of saline grassland in North China under different nitrogen addition levels

CHANG Jie^1,2, JU Xin^1,2, YI Likai^1,2, NING Yanan^1,2, DIAO Huajie^1,2, HAO Jie^1,2, WANG Changhui^1,2*, DONG Kuanhu^1,2

¹College of Grassland Science, Shanxi Agricultural University/Shanxi Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecological Protection and Native Grass Germplasm Innovation, Jinzhong 030801, Shanxi, China;
²Shanxi Youyu Loess Plateau Grassland Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Shuozhou 037200, Shanxi, China

Received:2023-08-21 Accepted:2023-11-25 Online:2024-01-18 Published:2024-03-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以华北农牧交错带重度盐渍化赖草草地为对象,研究不同水平氮处理(0、1、2、4、8、16、24、32 g N·m^-2·a^-1)下根际土壤、非根际土壤以及根际与非根际混合土壤的阴阳离子含量,分析外源氮输入影响盐渍化草地土壤理化特征的过程及机理。结果表明: 随着氮添加量的增加,根际、混合和非根际土壤的pH值均显著降低,与对照相比,32 g N·m^-2·a^-1处理下3种土壤pH值分别下降1.2、0.9和0.6,根际土壤的pH值比非根际土壤降低0.44。根际、混合和非根际土壤的Na⁺含量显著降低,NO₃^-含量显著升高。与对照相比,32 g N·m^-2·a^-1处理下根际土壤Na⁺含量占可溶性总盐含量的比例减少14%,非根际土壤减少12%,而根际土壤的NO₃^-含量占可溶性总盐含量的比例增加了29%,非根际土壤增加26%。pH值与土壤NO₃^-含量呈显著负相关,与Na⁺含量呈显著正相关。32 g N·m^-2·a^-1处理下根际土壤的可溶性总盐含量比对照显著减少31.5%,氮沉降可以降低土壤pH值和根际土壤可溶性总盐含量,减轻盐碱胁迫。

关键词: 氮沉降, 根际土壤, 碱性土, 赖草, 盐基离子

Abstract: We investigated the effects and mechanisms of nitrogen additions (0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32 g N·m^-2·a^-1) on contents of anion and cation in rhizosphere soil, bulk soil, and mixed rhizosphere and bulk soil in the heavily salinized grassland in the agro-pastoral ecotone of North China. The results showed that pH of rhizosphere, mixed and bulk soils decreased significantly with the increases of nitrogen addition levels. Moreover, pH of three soil types under the 32 g N·m^-2·a^-1 treatment decreased by 1.2, 0.9, and 0.6, respectively, while pH of rhizosphere soil decreased by 0.44 compared with the bulk soil. Na⁺ content of rhizosphere, mixed and bulk soils significantly decreased, while the NO₃^- content significantly increased. The proportion of Na⁺ content in total soluble salt content in rhizosphere soil decreased by 14% and that in bulk soil decreased by 12% after the 32 g N·m^-2·a^-1 addition. NO₃^- content increased by 29% in rhizosphere soil and by 26% in bulk soil. There was significant negative correlation between pH and NO₃^- content, and significant positive correlation between pH and Na⁺ content. The total soluble salt content of rhizosphere soil under the 32 g N·m^-2·a^-1 treatment was significantly reduced by 31.5%. Collectedly, nitrogen deposition could reduce soil pH and total soluble salt content of rhizosphere soil and alleviate saline-alkali stress.

Key words: nitrogen deposition, rhizosphere soil, alkaline soil, Leymus secalinus, base cation

常婕, 居新, 伊李凯, 宁亚楠, 刁华杰, 郝杰, 王常慧, 董宽虎. 不同水平氮添加下华北盐渍化草地根际土壤阴阳离子特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(1): 212-218.

CHANG Jie, JU Xin, YI Likai, NING Yanan, DIAO Huajie, HAO Jie, WANG Changhui, DONG Kuanhu. Characteristics of anion and cation in rhizosphere soil of saline grassland in North China under different nitrogen addition levels[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024, 35(1): 212-218.

参考文献

[1] Slama I, Abdelly C, Bouchereau A, et al. Diversity, distribution and roles of osmoprotective compounds accumulated in halophytes under abiotic stress. Annals of Botany, 2015, 115: 433-447
[2] 韩国栋. 中国草地资源. 草原与草业, 2021, 33(4): 2
[3] Bodirsky BL, Popp A, Lotze-Campen H, et al. Reactive nitrogen requirements to feed the world in 2050 and potential to mitigate nitrogen pollution. Nature Communications, 2014, 5: 3858
[4] Qin SQ, Fang K, Wang GQ, et al. Responses of exchangeable base cations to continuously increasing nitrogen addition in alpine steppe: A case study of Stipa purpurea steppe. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2018, 42: 95-104
[5] 杨建强, 刁华杰, 胡姝娅, 等. 不同水平氮添加对盐渍化草地土壤微生物特征的影响. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(7): 780-789
[6] Lucas RW, Klaminder J, Futter MN, et al. A meta-analysis of the effects of nitrogen additions on base cations: Implications for plants, soils, and streams. Forest Ecology and Management, 2016, 262: 95-104
[7] Högberg P, Fan HB, Quist M, et al. Tree growth and soil acidification in response to 30 years of experimental nitrogen loading on boreal forest. Global Change Biology, 2006, 12: 487-498
[8] Huntington TG. Assessment of calcium status in maine forests: Review and future projection. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2005, 35: 1109-1121
[9] 郑志杰, 刘仁燕, 陈宁, 等. 三峡库区2种土地利用方式下土壤盐基离子及碳氮含量对氮添加的响应. 水土保持学报, 2023, 37(1): 197-203
[10] 田圣贤. 氮化合物添加对草地土壤盐基离子和酸缓冲性能的影响. 硕士论文. 沈阳: 沈阳大学, 2018
[11] 王惠玲, 刁华杰, 崔乐乐, 等. 北方农牧交错带典型草地土壤呼吸及其组分对刈割强度的响应. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1403-1411
[12] 燕学东, 陈晓鹏, 郝杰, 等. 农牧交错带草地生态系统N₂O通量对短期氮, 磷添加的响应. 草地学报, 2022, 30(12): 3199-3206
[13] Chaudhary DR, Gautam RK, Yousuf B, et al. Nutrients, microbial community structure and functional gene abundance of rhizosphere and bulk soils of halophytes. Applied Soil Ecology, 2015, 91: 16-26
[14] 杨春霞, 李彩虹, 赵银宝. 离子色谱法测定土壤中无机阴阳离子含量. 理化检验: 化学分册, 2012, 48(10): 1199-1202
[15] Horswill P, O'Sullivan O, Phoenix GK, et al. Base cation depletion, eutrophication and acidification of species-rich grasslands in response to long-term simulated nitrogen deposition. Environmental Pollution, 2008, 155: 336-349
[16] Chen D, Li J, Lan Z, et al. Soil acidification exerts a greater control on soil respiration than soil nitrogen availability in grasslands subjected to long-term nitrogen enrichment. Functional Ecology, 2016, 30: 658-669
[17] Chapin III FS, Matson PA, Mooney HA, eds. Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology. New York: Springer, 2011: 247-249
[18] 李光超, 杨慧, 张春来, 等. 典型岩溶区板栗树下土壤pH值与盐基饱和度关系研究. 中国水土保持, 2012(8): 49-52
[19] Bowman WD, Cleveland CC, Halada Ĺ, et al. Negative impact of nitrogen deposition on soil buffering capacity. Nature Geoscience, 2008, 1: 767-770
[20] Yang Y, Ji C, Ma W, et al. Significant soil acidification across northern China's grasslands during 1980s-2000s. Global Change Biology, 2012, 18: 2292-2300
[21] Dise NB, Wright RF. Nitrogen leaching from European forests in relation to nitrogen deposition. Forest Ecology and Management, 1995, 71: 153-161
[22] 李秋玲, 肖辉林, 曾晓舵, 等. 模拟氮沉降对森林土壤化学性质的影响. 生态环境学报, 2013, 22(12): 1872-1878
[23] Pilon-Smits AH, Quinn CF, Tapken W, et al. Physiological functions of beneficial elements. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2009, 12: 267-274
[24] Lu X, Mao Q, Mo J, et al. Divergent responses of soil buffering capacity to long-term N deposition in three typical tropical forests with different land-use history. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49: 4072-4080
[25] Gundersen P, Schmidt IK, Raulund-Rasmussen K. Leaching of nitrate from temperate forests: Effects of air pollution and forest management. Environmental Reviews, 2006, 14: 1-57
[26] Cusack DF, Macy J, McDowell WH. Nitrogen additions mobilize soil base cations in two tropical forests. Biogeochemistry, 2016, 128: 67-88
[27] 侯杰, 叶功富, 张立华. 林木根际土壤研究进展. 防护林科技, 2006(1): 30-33
[28] Martens R. Contribution of rhizodeposits to the main-tenance and growth of soil microbial biomass. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1990, 22: 141-147
[29] Haynes RJ. Active ion uptake and maintenance of cation-anion balance: A critical examination of their role in regulating rhizosphere pH. Plant and Soil, 1990, 126: 247-264
[30] Richardson AE, Barea JM, McNeill AM, et al. Acquisition of phosphorus and nitrogen in the rhizosphere and plant growth promotion by microorganisms. Plant and Soil, 2009, 321: 305-339
[31] 韩雪, 王春梅, 张艺. 氮添加对温带森林根际、非根际土壤养分含量的影响. 2015年中国环境科学学会学术年会论文集, 中国深圳, 2015: 5653-5660
[32] Hassani A, Azapagic A, Shokri N. Predicting long-term dynamics of soil salinity and sodicity on a global scale. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020, 117: 33017-33027
[33] Kim KR, Owens G, Naidu R. Effect of root-induced chemical changes on dynamics and plant uptake of heavy metals in rhizosphere soils. Pedosphere, 2010, 20: 494-504
[34] 张福锁, 曹一平. 根际动态过程与植物营养. 土壤学报, 1992, 29(3): 239-250
[35] 王周琼, 李述刚. 准噶尔盆地温带荒漠土壤碱化分级的初步研究. 土壤学报, 1990, 27(4): 438-444
[36] Hasegawa PM. Sodium (Na⁺) homeostasis and salt tole-rance of plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2013, 92: 19-31
[37] 赵振杰, 张海龙, 王明晶, 等. 植物耐盐性相关细胞内pH和离子稳态的调控机制. 植物生理学报, 2020, 56(3): 337-344
[38] 周涛, 萨如拉, 郭永青, 等. 腐植酸水溶肥料对盐胁迫下燕麦阳离子含量及产量的影响. 腐植酸, 2015(4): 15-20

不同水平氮添加下华北盐渍化草地根际土壤阴阳离子特征

Characteristics of anion and cation in rhizosphere soil of saline grassland in North China under different nitrogen addition levels

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙官发, 陆梅, 闪昇阳, 赵定蓉, 孙煜佳, 刘国庆, 赵旭燕, 冯峻. 短期氮沉降对纳帕海高寒退化疏花早熟禾草甸土壤呼吸干湿季变化的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 390-398.
[2]	李菁, 张小飞, 张惠雯, 文嘉庆, 张焱, 徐玲玲. 盐胁迫对白及根际细菌群落组成及多样性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(1): 219-228.
[3]	孔东彦, 杨灵芳, 刁静文, 郭鹏. 不同生境下氮沉降对土壤N₂O通量影响的整合分析 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2171-2177.
[4]	代泽成, 刘月秀, 党宁, 王志瑞, 蔡江平, 张玉革, 宋永波, 李慧, 姜勇. 长期氮水添加对温带草原土壤化学性质和微生物学特性的短期遗留效应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1834-1844.
[5]	吕晶花, 赵旭燕, 陆梅, 李聪, 杨志东, 刘攀, 陈志明, 冯峻. 氮沉降下纳帕海草甸植被与土壤变化对微生物生物量碳氮的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1525-1532.
[6]	刘妍霁, 刘子恺, 金圣圣, 邓慧玉, 沈菊培, 贺纪正. 亚热带森林土壤氨氧化微生物和反硝化微生物功能基因丰度对氮磷输入的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 639-646.
[7]	史加勉, 宋鸽, 刘珊珊, 郑勇. 杉木林土壤丛枝菌根真菌形态特征及孢子相关细菌多样性对模拟氮沉降和干旱的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(12): 3291-3300.
[8]	顾嘉诚, 王文敏, 王振, 李鲁华, 蒋贵菊, 王家平, 程志博. 玉米/大豆间作对根际土壤磷素生物有效性和微生物群落结构的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3030-3038.
[9]	王毅焕, 靳一丹, 姜铭楷, 马书琴, 陈有超, 蔡延江. 短期氮沉降改变毛竹林凋落物和土壤有机质化学组成 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2593-2600.
[10]	孙健, 王亚艺, 张鑫鹏, 李松龄. 青海地区解磷微生物的筛选及对小油菜生长的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 221-228.
[11]	宋鸽, 李晓杰, 王全成, 吕茂奎, 谢锦升, 贺纪正, 郑勇. 杉木人工林土壤微生物生物量和碳源利用能力对模拟氮沉降和干旱的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2388-2396.
[12]	高贝, 胡艳宇, 张志委, 丁聪, 杨雁茹, 吕晓涛. 氮素添加对呼伦贝尔草甸草原植物氮钾元素含量和计量比的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(4): 981-987.
[13]	秦淑琦, 彭琴, 董云社, 齐玉春. 土壤呼吸对降雨变化和氮沉降交互作用响应的研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(4): 1145-1152.
[14]	徐敏, 刘苑苑, 元晓春, 曾泉鑫, 林惠瑛, 吴晓霞, 崔琚琰, 陈文伟, 陈岳民. 氮沉降下不同碳添加模式对亚热带毛竹林土壤激发效应的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(10): 2619-2627.
[15]	高晋丽, 宋艳宇, 宋长春, 宫超, 马秀艳, 高思齐, 刘桢迪. 北方泥炭地氮素有效性的变化及其对碳汇功能的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(10): 2663-2669.