保水剂用量对小麦不同生育期根系生理特性的影响

应用生态学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (01): 73-78.

保水剂用量对小麦不同生育期根系生理特性的影响

杨永辉^1,2,3,武继承^2**,吴普特^1,3,黄占斌⁴,赵西宁^1,3,管秀娟²,何方²

¹西北农林科技大学资源环境学院,陕西杨凌 712100;²河南省农业科学院植物营养与资源环境研究所,郑州 450002;³中国科学院-水利部水土保持研究所,陕西杨凌 712100;⁴中国矿业大学(北京),北京 100083

出版日期:2011-01-18 发布日期:2011-01-18

Effects of different application rates of water-retaining agent on root physiological characteristics of winter wheat at its different growth stages.

YANG Yong-hui1,2,3, WU Ji-cheng2, WU Pu-te1,3, HUANG Zhan-bin4, ZHAO Xi-ning1,3, GUAN Xiu-juan2, HE Fang2

1College of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Northwest A &|F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;2Institute of Plant Nutrition &|Resource Environment, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou 450002, China|3Institute of Soil and Water Conservation|Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China；4China University of Mining &|Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

Online:2011-01-18 Published:2011-01-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在河南禹州试验基地进行田间试验，研究了保水剂不同施用量（0、30、60、90 kg·hm^-2）对两个冬小麦品种（郑麦9694和矮抗58）根系生理生化特征、生物量及产量的影响，以探明保水剂对不同生育阶段冬小麦根系的作用机理.结果表明：施用保水剂降低了冬小麦根系质膜透性和可溶性糖含量，提高了根系活力.在各生育期，郑麦9694根系质膜透性降低幅度均大于矮抗58；除90 kg·hm^-2处理外，矮抗58的根系活力均显著大于郑麦9694.在孕穗期和灌浆期，郑麦9694的可溶性糖含量降低幅度显著大于矮抗58.在各生育期内，60 kg·hm^-2处理的两品种质膜透性和可溶性糖含量均最小，90 kg·hm^-2与60 kg·hm^-2处理差异不显著.随保水剂用量的增加，郑麦9694的根系活力显著提高，而矮抗58 在60 kg·hm^-2处理下最高.施用保水剂还提高了小麦根系生物量，在拔节期和孕穗期，矮抗58的根系生物量大于郑麦9694；而在灌浆期，矮抗58在60 kg·hm^-2和90 kg·hm^-2处理下根系生物量显著低于郑麦9694.郑麦9694和矮抗58产量均以60 kg·hm^-2处理增幅最高.综上，保水剂对郑麦9694的作用效果较矮抗58显著，并以60 kg·hm^-2施用量为佳.

关键词: 保水剂, 冬小麦, 根系, 生理特征, 生物量, 冷激锻炼, 番茄幼苗, 耐热性, 花芽分化

Abstract: A field experiment was conducted at the Yuzhou Experimental Base of Henan Province to study the effects of different application rates (0, 30, 60, and
90 kg·hm^-2) of water-retaining agent (WRA) on the root physiological characteristics, biomass, and grain yield of two winter wheat cultivars Zhengmai-9694 and Aikang-58, aimed to probe into the action mechanisms of WRA on the root system of winter wheat at its different growth stages. The application of WRA decreased the root membrane permeability and soluble sugar content, and increased the root vigor. After the application of WRA, the Zhengmai-9694 at its different growth stages had a greater decrement of root membrane permeability, compared with Aikang-58. In all treatments except 90 kg·hm^-2 of WRA, the root vigor of Aikang-58 was obviously higher than that of Zhengmai-9694. At booting and grain-filling stages, the root soluble sugar content of Zhengmai-9694 decreased much more than that of Aikang-58. In the whole growth period of the two cultivars, their root membrane permeability and soluble sugar content were the lowest in treatment 60 kg·hm^-2 of WRA, and no significant differences were observed between treatments 60 and 90 kg·hm^-2 of WRA. The root vigor of Zhengmai-9694 increased remarkably with the increasing rate of WRA application, while that of Aikang-58 was the highest in treatment 60 kg·hm^-2 of WRA. The application of WRA also increased root biomass, and at jointing and booting stages, the root biomass of Aikang-58 was much higher than that of Zhengmai-9694. However, at grain-filling stage, the biomass of Aikang-58 in treatments 60 and 90 kg·hm^-2 of WRA was lower than that of Zhengmai-9694. Treatment 60 kg·hm^-2 of WRA had the highest grain yield of the two cultivars. It was concluded that WRA had more significant effects on Zhengmai-9694 than on Aikang-58, and applying 60 kg·hm^-2 of WRA could obtain the best effect.

Key words: water-retaining agent, winter wheat, root, physiological characteristics, biomass, cold-shock, tomato seedling, heat resistance, flower bud differentiation.

杨永辉,武继承,吴普特,黄占斌,赵西宁,管秀娟,何方. 保水剂用量对小麦不同生育期根系生理特性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(01): 73-78.

[1]	李佳玉, 施秀珍, 李帅军, 王振宇, 王建青, 邹秉章, 王思荣, 黄志群. 杉木人工林和天然次生林林龄对土壤酶活性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 339-346.
[2]	王一帆, 李璇, 罗珊珊, 黄卓超, 丁真玉珍, 周楠, 赵允格. 温度和初始pH对生物结皮中4种优势蓝藻生长的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 516-522.
[3]	蔡洪梅, 王菲菲, 王捧娜, 唐志伟, 黄伟祥, 郑宝强, 李金才, 陈翔. 冬小麦越冬期壮苗评价方法与指标研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 555-563.
[4]	王翠娟, 刘小飞, 杨柳明, 贾淑娴. 中亚热带米槠人工林土壤微生物残体碳对凋落物和根系碳输入的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(1): 177-185.
[5]	苑淑媛, 张鹏, 沈海龙. 天然更新红松苗针叶光合和解剖特性对不同郁闭环境的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2314-2320.
[6]	代泽成, 刘月秀, 党宁, 王志瑞, 蔡江平, 张玉革, 宋永波, 李慧, 姜勇. 长期氮水添加对温带草原土壤化学性质和微生物学特性的短期遗留效应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1834-1844.
[7]	杨浩, 王文龙, 娄义宝, 冯兰茜, 朱亚男. 黄土塬沟壑区典型植被沟头土壤渗透性和抗剪强度特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1862-1870.
[8]	吕晶花, 赵旭燕, 陆梅, 李聪, 杨志东, 刘攀, 陈志明, 冯峻. 氮沉降下纳帕海草甸植被与土壤变化对微生物生物量碳氮的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1525-1532.
[9]	刘珊珊, 王全成, 史加勉, 刘子恺, 沈菊培, 贺纪正, 郑勇. 亚热带森林菌根植物根系真菌群落结构对氮磷添加的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1547-1554.
[10]	杨毅轩, 陈应枝, 唐芃, 林文, 孙敏, 高志强. 播种方式对黄淮海麦区西部冬小麦氮素利用与产量形成的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1572-1582.
[11]	陈月鹏, 李石开, 安波, 朱勇, 邹汉鲁, 崔松祥, 付宏燕, 毛瑢, 张芸. 亚热带树种的菌根和根外菌丝对土壤氮矿化及酶活性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1235-1243.
[12]	张晓伟, 杨显贺, 车豪杰, 秦竞, 毕焕改, 艾希珍. 腐熟玉米秸秆对设施土壤环境及黄瓜产量和品质的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1290-1296.
[13]	王娇, 关欣, 黄苛, 段萱, 陈波翰, 张伟东, 杨庆朋. 酸雨和根系去除对杉木和火力楠人工林土壤有机碳的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 937-945.
[14]	吕付泽, 杨雅丽, 鲍雪莲, 张常仁, 郑甜甜, 何红波, 张旭东, 解宏图. 免耕不同秸秆覆盖量对黑土微生物群落及其残留物的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 903-912.
[15]	豆梦珂, 张伟东, 杨庆朋, 陈龙池, 刘晔嘉, 胡亚林. 杉木种植和磷添加对土壤微生物生物量及胞外酶活性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 631-638.